March 29, 2009 by Norman McCullough.

Mr. Sturm:

I can not let this disgraceful action you have undertaken to go unanswered. A few short weeks ago you responded to an invitation to have dinner at my home with my wife and Bob and Kay Frank.

We extended the invitation because we thought you were running as an independent candidate to demonstrate to the community that you had independent thoughts , and you wanted the freedom to draw your own conclusions free from the biased opinions of a “Slate” induced platform that is obviously hell bent on destroying Bob Frank’s reputation as a citizen, and a true leader who is not afraid to shine a light on the cover up of past events that have cost this association a great deal of money.

Now - you have shown your true colors by allowing your statement to be published only on the BLOG of David Berman who is the most notorious disgraced past Vice President in Sun City Anthem history.

During your visit at my home you reviewed only a few of the documents that I have archived that may (in the end), prove to be evidence of major misconduct of the board and some past members of the board of directors. You were also shown what I believe to be evidence of a scam involving the manipulation of data given the reserve specialist employed by this association by Jack Troia another “Unity Candidate.” As a direct result of this scam, 162 members of this association have suffered financially.

You met and talked with my neighbor who will be celebrating her 100^th birthday in May of this year. You also met the Treasurer of The Villa Group. The very same widowed lady that was chastised by Mike Dixon because she dared question Mike Dixon’s idiotic pronouncement that “Del Webb gave the Villas a GIFT”. You visited her home and even inspected some of the floor tile. All the while you professed to be considerate of our plight and seemed willing to work to shed light on the cover up of the actions of the past board members (like David Berman), who have affected this communities financial well being, and have engineered a “Unity” stranglehold on the free election process.

I hereby make this announcement that because of your calloused and uncaring attitude to discover the truth by adopting the “Unity” doctrine of “never looking back” I would never vote for you, and I ask that every one who considers the truth to be more important than politics to Vote Smart and vote for Bob Frank and Ron Morse - period.

Why would anyone waste their vote on any candidate who has no respect for their own good name and align them selves with a disgraced attorney? Now we find someone who claims to be an “Independent” candidate who runs to the “Unity” camp declaring that a bland statement like the following Quote;

“In short, Anthem Voice believes that Bob Frank, Ron Morse, and Barnett Sturm are the only independent candidates this year.”

Some how is derogatory? No - Barnett, there is more here than meets the eye. This is what YOU have destroyed by the statements you made on the disgraced attorneys BLOG.

You said on your campaign flyer Quote;

“My Goal is to apply my extensive career experience to ensuring efficient and transparent operations of our Homeowners Association.”

Sorry Barnett - I don’t see anything “transparent” about continuing the cover up. You might be able to regain some respect by announcing right now what your stand is on a forensic audit. That’s what the “Unity” candidates are afraid of.

Are you going to continue the cover up and let the reserves of this association go un-audited? Are you against uncovering what it REALLY cost the members of this community when Del Webb WAS ALLOWED to disobey Nevada Statutes by skipping the requirements of providing a well funded reserve study at the time of transition? Do you have the “Spine” to uncover what past board members like David Berman have cost us?

After reading your outrageous statement on the disgraced former attorneys BLOG, I think not. Have fun writing in David’s pigpen that he calls Anthem Journal. Of course I have been banned for some time, but even if I were allowed to, I have higher standards. You apparently do not.

Posted in 2009 Campaign, SCA Board, Community Affairs, Other | Print | No Comments »

March 26, 2009 by THE VOICE.

Attached are PDF versions of the April 2009 The Vegas Voice issue containing Anthem VOICE’s second, pull-out supplement.

See pages 1-15, 2-16, 3-17 and 4-18 in the center section of the full publication.
Apr09 Vegas Voice Paper with Athem VOICE Supplement

Here is the 4-page supplement by itself.
Anthem VOICE April ‘09 Supplement

The Vegas Voice newspaper will be in Sun City Anthem mailboxes by the middle of next week.

Reminder:  Anthem VOICE Seminar on Tuesday, April 7, 2009.  Keynote topics are BLM Open Pit Mine and Construction Defects.  See this flyer for more details:

Seating is limited.  Send email RSVPs to anthemvoice@cox.net.   Attendance free to all SCA members.
Seminar Flyer for Tuesday, April 7, 2009

Posted in 2009 Campaign, Truth Squad, SCA Board, Community Affairs, Operations | Print | 1 Comment »

March 25, 2009 by bobfrank.

 Here are the PDF versions of the hate mail and my response seen below:

scarfs.pdf     Response to SCARFS Political Hit Piece

—————————————–

Bob Frank’s Response to the Sun City Anthem Residents For Sanity (SCARFS) Political Hate Mail

Only cowards and scoundrels distribute hate mail without their names on it. The recent SCARFS community-wide mailing by “dozens of SCA friends and neighbors” is an insult to the entire SCA community, and a false representation of Bob Frank’s service to our community.

Below is a partial response to the slanderous accusations in the SCARFS hate mail. The smartest thing for SCA residents to do is simply trash the document. Even better yet, if you have any information as to the individuals behind this mailing, please send that information to bobfrank@cox.net.

Allegation 1: “For the past two years …Bob Frank, has practiced a confrontational, obstructionist brand of politics that has created great friction among his fellow directors and discouraged residents from stepping forward as community volunteers.”

Bob Frank’s Response:  Yes, I confront dishonest and dishonorable people when they do something wrong; and yes, I try to block Board actions that would hurt our community.  I am the only person on the Board with the integrity to stand up to flawed policies.  If this is bad, then I plead guilty.

Allegation 2:  Bob Frank entered office on a promise of giving and showing respect, but he has proved that even mild criticism will be met with bullying and threatening, intimidating responses.

Bob Frank’s Response:  The criticisms referenced here by Linda Krivec and Frank Blaha were public and quite hateful. I can share with anyone interested, the nasty items they posted, and my private, respectful responses to them.

Allegation 3:  A senior Air Force officer in an era when relatively few women were in the upper military ranks, Bob Frank has been especially hostile to the two women on the current Board.

Bob Frank’s Response:  I have never been, and never will be hostile to or discriminate against anyone—especially women. Hostile is what the SCARF hate mail is!  I am proud of my 22 years of military service, and I deeply resent the callous attempt to denigrate it.

Allegation 4: This is what Mr. Frank wrote… “I believe that HOA standing committees tend to evolve into social cliques that function something like high school, college and other social fraternities. Instead of being solely focused on the high-value business matters of this community, standing committees tend to be just another kind of ‘club’.”

Bob Frank’s Response:  I am not alone in this thinking. Nearly everyone in SCA has been exposed to the controlling and petty thinking of some committees. If telling the truth is a crime, I deserve to be punished.

Allegation 5:  Frank voted “no” on issues we think he should have supported.

Bob Frank’s Response:

1.    I voted against the 2009 SCA Budget because the proposed dues level of $960 was TOO HIGH. The board could not justify the raise of dues from $940 to $1,100 in 2008, and I also voted no at that time. Then they had to reduce them and grant credit on the accounts. This confusing fiasco was obviously avoidable.

2.     I voted against retaining the auditor selected/hired by Del Webb/Pulte for SCA during the past decade—and that was the correct position.  We need fresh eyes and different expertise to help protect our homeowner interests.

3.    I voted against the 3rd Rec. Ctr. sellout orchestrated by the board majority where they agreed to give away over a million dollars to the developer for no good reason.

4.    I voted against proceeding with a Trumpets sole-source negotiation with just one candidate because having more competition could allow us to reduce our risks and negotiate better terms and conditions. The board’s gross mismanagement of the Trumpets lease for the past 5 years has cost members close to a million dollars.

Allegation 6: When Bob Frank and his spouse were working to get a fellow resident elected to the Board last year, they provided information on how bypass the log in rules.

Bob Frank’s Response:  The fact is my wife did absolutely nothing improper.  If anyone had violated anything, the Board or CAM would have certainly issued a warning or sanction.  Complaints about this matter point right to David Berman as being a key player in the SCARFS group.  No one else cares about this trivial topic.

Allegation 7: Bob Frank has frequently threatened our home values by going to outside media with allegations of irregularities in the operations of Sun City Anthem.

Bob Frank’s Response:  My claims were accurate and appropriate.  Cleaning up our financial management issues will greatly enhance our home values. I must have been close to the mark or they would not have over-reacted as they did.  Imagine sending a political hit piece about me to all owners, at association expense, without allowing me to respond in kind?  They are intensely worried about what I am saying and doing!

Allegation 8: Don’t vote for Bob Frank.

Bob Frank’s Response: Don’t vote for me unless you value ethics and openness.  And, be prepared to take full responsibility for your choice if I am not re-elected to continue pressing for honesty and professionalism.

Posted in Truth Squad, 2009 Campaign, SCA Board, Community Affairs, Operations, Lifestyle | Print | No Comments »

March 20, 2009 by bobfrank.

Norm,

Thank you for your informative posting; but, you missed at least one key item that must not be forgotten or ignored.

The 2005 and 2006 board members, the CAM, finance committee members, and our association attorney were willfully (and some are beginning to suggest criminally) negligent by not demanding that the trumpets lessee fully pay its rent and catering revenue shares. There can be no valid defense for any of those individuals (especially the former attorneys) to try to claim they could do nothing about enforcing the lease while the association was losing tens of thousands of dollars for over 2 years! Hiding behind a claimed need for a board majority vote to do something is not a valid excuse for ignoring law violations.

So-called secret negotiations by Favil West, Bob Berman, and Dea McDonald (Pulte Vice President) over possible modifications to the existing lease had nothing to do with collecting the rent for the active lease during the multi-year period. It is truly outrageous for someone to try to claim otherwise! And, the subsequent proposed trumpets lease revisions showed how badly the community has been deceived by the 2-year “negotiations” process while rent was not being collected.

There could be no valid excuses by any involved director for not acting aggressively to try to force collection of the rent by placing the lessee in breech of contract and denying access to the premises until all payments had been received. Members of the CAM and finance committees also failed their legal duties by ignoring the obvious lease collection problems, and by going along with the board’s misconduct.

As a result of those 2005-2006 director failures of their fiduciary duties, and for demonstrating long-term flawed business judgments, the association lost hundreds of thousands of dollars. Certain individuals have every reason to be very worried about possible consequences of a forensic audit of that fiasco.

However, it is never too late to recover some of those financial losses. What we need is a board majority committed to recovering as much as possible from every possible source (where the ROI makes sense), and the community will discover the truth. Every net dollar recovered is a dollar saved from future dues increases. Every member should care about the outcome of this issue.

Meanwhile, do not accept lame excuses or forgive such gross misbehavior.

Bob Frank
SCA Director

Posted in 2009 Campaign, SCA Board, Community Affairs, News! | Print | 1 Comment »

March 20, 2009 by Norman McCullough.

If you are successful in your bid to be seated on the board of directors, you will inherit a big problem from the present board. The problem is because the Villa owners have been cheated out of a lot of money. In case your wondering what it’s all about, and why this problem STILL NOT SETTLED, I have presented here the terms of the Villa agreement.

Please take note of the last two items on this list. Those last two items explain the rights of ANY Villa owner or ANY member of this association to question the current or any future board about the terms of the agreement.

Because of the current boards actions under Roz Berman and Mike Dixon YOU will have to answer when called to do so. You can’t simply ignore the problem any longer, because the problem will still be here if you are elected.

Here then are the terms of the Villa Agreement.

————————————————-

RELEASE OF AGREEMENT

• End of June, Pulte agreed to release the confidentiality clause and the Board received permission to release the agreement.

• The Association (via prior Board) accepted liability from Pulte on any future complaints regarding reserve funding for the villas.

• Pulte has no further responsibility for reserve funding past the exchange of the $241,000 payment and the agreement to refresh hardscape.

• Further claims or discussions must be with the Association.

• The Agreement affects all SCA homeowners, not just villa owners.

7/20/2007

Posted in 2009 Campaign, SCA Board, Community Affairs, Other | Print | No Comments »

March 16, 2009 by bobfrank.

For those who have called and/or may be wondering:   I was invited, but elected to not place any re-election information on David and Roz Berman’s Unity Slate blog.

I want nothing to do with the site and the people who have developed and promoted SCA political parties and slate campaigns. Slate politics and politics of personal destruction have done our community great damage. These practices should be rejected by all SCA members.

I urge all SCA members to get to know all of the candidates. Make individual choices for whom you will trust to assess and spend your hard-earned money to maintain and grow our community. History shows that only when electing directors do you have any real power to make a difference for the next year or two.

Spend a little time to get to know the character, ethics and business management qualifications of each candidate, and then, VOTE SMART.

Sincerely,

Bob Frank
SCA Director

Posted in 2009 Campaign, SCA Board, Lifestyle, Other | Print | 4 Comments »

March 16, 2009 by Mark Cook.

If you haven’t checked your bathtub spigot for proper installation, you might have a problem.  The spigot must be seated squarely against the wall, and sealed with caulk all around the perimeter.  This spigot was poorly installed.  It must be fixed to prevent water leaking down into the wall where it will cause mold and all kinds of other undesirable consequences.

The spigot can be removed by using a wrench inserted into the screw on the underside. 

Once the spigot is removed, all of the other parts which are under the spigot can be removed by sliding them off the end of the copper pipe.  Notice their sequence, so they can be installed properly when repairs are made.  The chrome ring should also be sealed against the wall with caulk.

Now for the horror story.  After removing the chrome ring shown above, hopefully you won’t see a sight like this.

Notice the gap around the pipe, that’s not watertight!  In this case, the plumber stuffed wadded up paper into the gap, then smeared on a little caulk.  Of course that’s very poor workmanship.  The paper stuffing and the caulk has to be removed, and the hole, which is too large and not centered in the first place, must be filled thoroughly with caulk.

 Wait at least 24 hours for that caulk to dry, then apply another layer to insure that the pipe is watertight to the wall.  Then install the chrome ring and caulk around the edge of it.  Slide the parts back on the pipe, install the spigot tightly against the wall, and tighten the screw.  Finally, apply a bead of caulk around the base of the spigot and you’ve completed the job much better than the builder. 

There’s one last point I’d like to make.  When we were having a lot of problems with construction defects, sloppy construction, you name it we saw it, a Pulte official told us “we slap the houses up then come along later and fix the problems”.   That is of course if the owner finds all of the problems before the warranty runs out.  Pulte officials bragged about building a house in 75 days.  We’d rather have quality than speed. 

Caveat Emptor. 

Posted in Community Affairs, News!, Other | Print | No Comments »

March 14, 2009 by Norman McCullough.

Was it FRAUD or gross negligence committed by SCA Boards concerning Reserves funds due by the developer since May of 2005?  Now that the board election is once again upon us, that issue HAS to be (finally) answered this year!

NRS Statutes REQUIRE that a Declarant provide a Reserve study and fully fund it at the time of transition to resident control. Del Webb/Pulte (The Declarant) commissioned TWO such studies. The first was submitted to the Board of Directors and unanimously rejected. The second (replacement) reserve study was the 2006 reserve study, and it WAS adopted by the Board. So, why was it necessary for this current Board of Directors to conduct a “2008 Reserve Look-back” and set up a committee to supposedly supply the association with the “Fully Funded” numbers at the time of transition?

Well, the 2nd reserve study received by this association from the developer, was even worse than the first–because it was NOT computed using the mandated May 2005 DATE OF TRANSITION.  It was done wrong twice, and our Board of Directors (including Dea McDonald,  a Pulte Vice President and former SCA Board President) failed to ever require the developer to comply with the law.  Does that sound like serious conflicts of interest to you?

But, instead of requiring the developer to get the study right and fully fund its cash obligations, the SCA Board of Directors set up a special Finance Committee group in 2008 (The Reserve Look Back Committee), to modify the study by computing the “Fully Funded” values for May 2005.  But, let’s go a step further, and ask the multi-million-dollar question.

WHY did the board of directors (including Favil West, Bob Berman, David Berman and Finance Committee Members/board candidates Roz Berman and Jack Troia) FAIL to REJECT THE SECOND reserve study in 2006, and fail to require the developer to get it done right, and pay its obligations according to the law?

Said another way, why DID the SCA Board accept the unlawful 2nd study? And, why were SCA HOMEOWNER funds used to fill up the reserve accounts in 2005 thru 2008 INSTEAD of demanding DW/Pulte fully pay its obligations?  Should we consider that to be simple or gross negligence, or could there be fraud involved because the developer received such high financial benefits–at the expense of SCA homeowners?

Can anyone think of a single valid reason to fail to collect the hundreds of thousands of dollars due from the developer in 2005? And, did EVERY budget from the year 2006 until the present time fail to include the money owed by Del Webb at the time of transition?

Finally, how much would our dues/assessments have been reduced if Del Webb/Pulte had been required to obey the Nevada Statutes in May 2005?  How much did that shortage of hundreds of thousand of dollars by the developer cause our dues/assessments to be excessive in 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009?

Why has the current board of directors, and all past boards since the transition, refused to answer these obvious questions? What value has our homeowners received from this failure to collect over a million dollars of reserve funds?

After tolerating 3 years of cover ups, are we going to insist on receiving clear answers this year?  Vote SMART.

Posted in 2009 Campaign, Truth Squad, SCA Board, Community Affairs, Other | Print | No Comments »

March 12, 2009 by THE VOICE.

BLM Mining Project Update Report Attached: blm-news-12mar09.pdf

Posted By Request of:
GEORGE MEESE
BLM Mining Project Leader

Posted in SCA Board, Community Affairs, Lifestyle | Print | No Comments »

March 12, 2009 by Norman McCullough.

Sun City Anthem residents and Board Members need to be better informed about the Nevada State and community rules that govern our lives. The basic documents governing the SCA Home Owner Association are: Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) Chapter 116, Nevada Administrative Code (NRC)116, SCA ByLaws, SCA Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions (CC&Rs), and SCA Rules and Regulations

The CC&Rs—the “Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions”—are the governing documents that dictate how the homeowners association operates and what rules the owners must obey. These documents and rules are legally enforceable by the homeowner association, unless a specific provision conflicts with federal, state or local laws.

SCA’s CC&Rs cover a broad range of topics, including: age restrictions for residents, the number of occupants per house, garage door openings, parking restrictions, house painting, free-standing flag poles, voting rights, association fee increases, reserve funds, expansion of the community, vacation villas, golf ball damage to homes, activity cards, dispute resolution, and many more topics. The writer wishes to point out to this community the specific items mentioned - namely HOUSE PAINTING AND RESERVE FUNDS.

The major problem with the current CC&Rs as well as other documents that govern Sun City Anthem is the fact that they were written by the Del Webb/Pulte developer (Declarant) to protect developer interests. Now that SCA is a resident administered common interest community, the current board of directors (with the exception of Bob Frank), are administering the developer included provisions that are harming the residents of this community.

How can anyone justify allowing Del Webb (Declarant) to completely ignore the NRS statutes that demand a full accounting of the financial conditions of this community via of a viable reserve study and a full AND COMPLETE accounting of all bank accounts at the time of transition?

This current board of directors (with the exception of Bob Frank), is engaged in a cover-up of the failed policies of the past boards and the finance committee members that allowed that to happen. Roz Berman knows more than she is willing to admit because she was a volunteer member of the finance committee around the time of transition, and Jack Troia was even on the Transition committee when this travesty occurred, but he is unwilling to answer the questions that have naturally followed.

The residents of this community have A RIGHT TO ASK FOR ANSWERS.

FACT:  Three and a half years have passed since the date of transition.

THIS ASSOCIATION HAS STILL NOT RECONCILED THE BOOKS AND THE BANK ACCOUNTS THAT WAS A MANDATE OF THE STATE AT THE TIME OF TRANSITION ON MAY 31, 2005. WHY??

The CC&Rs must be modified or rewritten to remove conflicts and contradictions with revisions in Nevada NRS and NAC regulations. Other CC&R revisions might also be in order in spite of the fact that it is (a) a monumental task and (b) our past Board President (Mike Dixon), has stated that, while he is in office, it won’t be done because it is too difficult to do.

Still, some changes to consider are: setting lower-level resident voting standards for changing rules or approving budget changes; removing conflicting rules on resident/common property maintenance; and updating architectural review standards.

Posted in 2009 Campaign, SCA Board, Laws & Rules, Other | Print | 1 Comment »

March 7, 2009 by bobfrank.

Because of the recent posts on this blog, and due to the Anthem VOICE supplement article in The Vegas Voice paper about Trumpets, I have received calls and requests to briefly comment about why so much money was lost on the restaurant lease since 2005?

Previous questions: “Why did the board fail to collect the hundreds of thousands of dollars of rent money and catering revenue shares in 2005 and 2006 from the trumpets lessee? Who was responsible?”

Short Answer: The 2005 and 2006 Boards, Finance Committees and Community Managers completely failed to effectively manage the restaurant lease. The reasons for this massive failure remains a deep, dark secret. We know that failure to act properly in this case was not due to ignorance, lack of expertise, or lack of authority.  The only known benefactors were the developer and its chosen lessee.

The people involved, and their friends, are not talking. Instead, they demand that we all just look forward and forget the past misconduct and I am attacked for daring to ask the questions. The total losses since 2005 have amounted to many hundreds of thousands of dollars, and members have suffered an empty/losing restaurant space for well over a year. How can this fiasco be ignored since members will eventually have to make up for the losses?

Could it have been avoided? You bet!   The facts show that on any given month between May of 2005 and April 2007, the board officers COULD have provided a written notice to the lessee that it was in breach/default. The lessee could have been given 30 days to become fully compliant or lose its access to the premises. Since Trumpets annual catering revenues were estimated in the millions of dollars at that time, the lessee would have been driven to quickly pay all funds due to SCA to avoid interruptions/bad publicity to its catering business.

In addition, Nevada Law provided a unique and powerful way to unilaterally terminate the lease in 2005 and 2006. Terminating the lease and being open to possible re-negotiation of a new lease, after all funds due were received, was a viable option.

See details in NRS 116.3105
http://www.leg.state.nv.us/NRS/NRS-116.html#NRS116Sec3105

1. Responsible 2005 Board Officers included President David Weil, Vice President David Berman, and Secretary/Treasurer Favil West (who had also been the board Treasure since 2002.)

2. Responsible 2006 Board Officers included President Favil West, VP Bob Berman, Secretary Elaine Berg, and Treasurer Kay Dwyer.

3. Responsible 2005-2006 Finance Committee Members included Chairman Jack Troia and member Roz Berman.

4. Responsible Community Managers included Arnie Snow and Terry DaSilva.

5. Responsible attorney was John Leach, and the responsible auditor was Gary Lein.

Continuing to cover up such a major financial misconduct is not acceptable. Our members paid with their hard-earned money for the losses of hundreds of thousands of dollars, and we also had to suffer poor restaurant service.  Were all of the above equally responsible for the massive failures?  Of course not!  But, it is a mystery why none of them have been willing to help clean up the issue.  In my opinion, assisting with the cover up of misconduct is a serious breech of duty.

If the facts were fully known, there is a possibility that some of the losses could be recovered through various insurance policies, legal claims, and other methods. But, without the full facts and cooperation by those involved, recovery may not be feasible.

Help me to help you get to the truth, recover some of the losses, and help avoid unnecessary dues/assessment increases in the future. Send me email with your suggestions: bobfrank@cox.net

Bob Frank
SCA Director

Posted in 2009 Campaign, Truth Squad, SCA Board, Community Affairs, Operations | Print | 1 Comment »

March 4, 2009 by tim_stebbins.

At the regular monthly meeting of the Government Affairs Advisory Committee on March 4, 2009, five of the six members resigned to protest the unacceptable behavior of some current and former members of the SCA board of directors.

Included in this action were Committee Chairperson Ms. Joan Patrick and Committee Vice Chairperson Ms. Rana Goodman. Each committee member professionally presented their disappointment and frustration as they read their personal letter of resignation.

It is indeed refreshing to see people of conviction stand up for their principals. All are people of immense character with enormous talent and experience. It seems some or all of these individuals feel they can and will better serve the interests of the SCA community homeowners as a citizens group independent from the board. They each deserve our support and cooperation as they move forward.

Posted in Community Affairs, Clubs & SIGs, Operations, News!, Other | Print | 3 Comments »

March 3, 2009 by Norman McCullough.

This letter was sent to Roz Berman today.

ltr2roz-berman.pdf

Norm McCullough
SCA Villas Representative

Posted in Other | Print | 1 Comment »

March 2, 2009 by THE VOICE.

All Sun City Anthem residents and 30,000 other Las Vegas age-restricted residents will be receiving a special AV supplement in their mailboxes during this week.  The basic newspaper is named The Vegas Voice.

For those who are traveling or otherwise miss this historic issue, an online PDF version is available at:
http://thevegasvoice.net/

For those who would like to download the first page and AV 4-page supplement only, here is the file:
Anthem VOICE Supplement, March 2009

Posted in 2009 Campaign, SCA Board, Community Affairs, News! | Print | No Comments »

March 1, 2009 by bobfrank.

Thank you to all who wrote and called with your prayers and messages of concern.  To have such support is truly gratifying.

I have been out of the Nellis AFB Hospital for a few days.  I feel fully recovered and am already fully involved in all of my responsibilities.

Bob Frank
SCA Director

Posted in 2009 Campaign, SCA Board, Community Affairs | Print | No Comments »