In accordance with Nevada Revised Statutes, board candidates and unit owners are entitled to publish their opposing views in association media channels and at no cost to the members.

And, for the first time in SCA history, I have exercised those rights on April 16, 2010 (See Below Attachments).

Included are my April 16,  2010 letter to the Board, my prepared statement to members to be included in the revised ballot package for distribution before May 1, 2010, and my revised candidate flyer.

It could be critical to the election success, and to the future of this association, if the board refuses to honor my reasonable and lawful requests.

Meanwhile, it could be useful if other candidates and SCA homeowners would review the details of NRS 116.3103 and NRS116.311 75.  It seems clear that board candidates and other unit owners are entitled to publish their opposing views to the board’s policies.

The law appears to not limit the available channels for opposing views to just the  magazine.  For example, recent board decisions to prohibit the use of Ch99 resources for campaign purposes would appear to be incorrect, if not unlawful.

For probably obvious reasons, the Directors and CAM have not previously explained these new, lawful ways to openly debate matters of broad community interest.

List of my recent correspondence with the Board of Directors:
[1] kay_frank_ltr2_bod_16apr2010.pdf
[2] kayfrank_ballot-statement.pdf
[3] kay_frank_flyer_16apr2010.pdf

Kay  Frank, 2010 Independent Candidate for the Board