Fatally Flawed Restaurant Gambling Poll/Ballot?

Many members are not aware there are no State or SCA rules governing the integrity of the lessee’s ‘poll/ballot’ about putting gambling into the restaurant area.

The proposed Ballot Box Company contract to conduct the poll will be with the lessee–not the association. This can NOT be a ’secret’ ballot that can be trusted.

No director or member could have any right to supervise the processes, inspect the ballots or the counting, or challenge the results. There are no consequences if fraud is suspected and/or discovered.

Who would blindly trust the lessee and/or the Ballot Box Company when millions of dollars of long-term membership funds and prime facilities are being put at risk by this type of informal poll?

So, why are so many members, all of the SCA directors, and the association attorneys going along with such a flawed idea? 

Has SCA Director/Attorney/Former Judge ProTem Ann Small failed her fiduciary duty to members, and violated some of her rules of professional conduct?

See this link to NV Attorney Rules of Professional Conduct:
http://www.leg.state.nv.us/courtrules/rpc.html

This entry was posted on October 9, 2010 at 19:49 and is filed under Ann_Small, SCA Board, Community Affairs, Operations. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

| Print