Below are files containing the words in 5 recent Nevada Real Estate Division Intervention Affidavit requests filed by Norman McCullough against one or more of the SCA Directors.

Normally, such formal Intervention Affidavit words are held confidential by those making the allegations in hopes of reaching some kind of private settlement or justice from the State agencies.  But, that has not been the case.  This time, we have posted the affidavit details, and some online links of validation, to respond to those members who complain that insufficient detail is available to know what is going on.

Some readers will complain of having to deal with too much detail.  Others will complain about there never being sufficient facts posted to know the whole truth.  So, consider the following to be a middle ground.  Those who want the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, can contact us for even more details.  Either way, a fair-minded person should see that the directors can not be blindly trusted to always make honorable and legal decisions.  And, members should wonder, what they would do if the board’s unchecked wrath is ever turned on them?

In the meantime, we are not aware of one single dispute over board actions between a SCA member and the SCA Directors that has ever been settled to mutual agreement.  Nor has there been any punishment against past SCA Board misconduct, so one has to conclude the system is unfair to homeowners, and there are no reasons to keep the detailed allegations private.  It is past time to show the entire membership how they have been deceived by the directors and CAMs, and the only way to do that is through the public media channels.

This change in approach may draw some adverse public attention to the board’s gross negligence and other misconduct, but before anyone tries to condemn the victimized members for going public, it must be remembered that it was the Director’s choice to abuse their power, and to refuse to resolve major conflicts in private.

Also, each filing with the State of Nevada requires Norm to certify under oath that he is telling the truth to the best of his ability, and to recognize there could be State punishment if any allegation is found to be willfully false or frivolous.  Each filing also requires the Directors to formally respond to the member about the allegations, and they have refused to do so.  But, the directors are never punished for failing to tell the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

So, no matter who you are, or if you have previously supported the unity and other SCA political party activities, how can you have blind faith in the Director’s perfect judgment and behavior?   In these reported cases (which are a small percentage of the more than 100 filed by various members in the past couple of years), what conclusion can there be except that the Directors have been aggressively working to “retaliate” against Norm and Mary McCullough for refusing to shut up about the financial errors and omissions committed against the villas owners in the past few years?  The McCulloughs have suffered real financial harm involving hundreds, if not thousands, of dollars from SCA Board’s uncaring, mismanagement and RMI participation. Are there not significant litigation risks apparently willfully created by the Directors for SCA and themselves by such unexplainable director behavior?

It is particularly sad when one realizes that the money owed to the villas owners could have been refunded instead of wasted on association attorney fees paid to cover up the Board’s mistakes.  And, if you disagree, please post your common sense explanation for the board’s behavior.   We just don’t understand it….

—–Norman McCullough’s Allegations Against SCA Board Statute Violations——–
Affidavit #1
[1] Affidavit #2
[2] Affidavit #3
[3] Affidavit #4
[4] Affidavit #5

——————–
There has been massive evidence previously posted online by most of the SCA blogs concerning apparent SCA Board deception, fraud and corruption.  Here are just a few links to corroborating evidence of apparent willful board law violations against Norman and Mary McCullough. No one can honestly claim that no hard evidence against the Directors has been previously released.

For example, Ron Johnson has consistently reported the truth on SCA-View.  Here are just some recent examples:

[5] http://www.scaview.org/TheCoverUp.html

[6] http://www.scaview.org/Deceit.html

[7] http://www.scaview.org/JusticeDenied.html

[8] http://www.scaview.org/TheMcCulloughHearing.html

[9] http://www.scaview.org/BermanComplaint.html

[10] http://www.scaview.org/BoardLost150000sf.html

Previously posted on Anthem Today:

[11] http://www.anthemtoday.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=2218&p=3923&hilit=mccullough#p3923

[12] http://www.anthemtoday.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=2073&p=3588hilit=mccullough#p3588

Previously posted on this Anthem VOICE blog:

[13] http://blog.anthemvoice.org/2010/09/10/mccullough-foundnot-guilty/

[14]  http://blog.anthemvoice.org/2010/08/29/was-it-a-charade-or-fraud/

[15] http://blog.anthemvoice.org/2010/08/25/board-to-hold-kangaroo-court-on-august-26-2010/

Those who help cover up and blindly ignore such blatant board misconduct must be considered parties to what clearly looks like fraud and abuse.  NV history shows that if similar conduct was performed by (for example) the Henderson City Council or the Clark County Commission, the responsible officials were criminally charged and some went to jail.

But, because of apparently corrupt HOA enforcement, our board has skated free–without any accountability for their misconduct.  The only solution is to abolish political parties in SCA and elect independent truly directors who can be trusted to be ethical and honor their promises to SCA members/shareholders/homeowners.